conflation theory. Current empirical research is ambiguous in its evaluation of ITA outcomes, but an interesting strand finds that the difference in treatment afforded to developed and developing respondent states in ITA seems to be explained by a conflation of democratic governance and economic development status. National and international investment policy. MA, Political Science, University of Oslo (2010-2012). Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration (May 2, 2017). Poor States or Poor Governance? Political economy of the investment regime. The reading group is managed by PluriCourts, but open to everyone that is interested.
Bergen island ferry, Webdesign bergen,
BA, Development Studies, University of Oslo (2007-2010). Analyst, Accenture Management Consulting Norway (2012-2015). Cookie Use and, data Transfer outside the. Suggested Citation, behn, Daniel and Berge, Tarald Laudal and Langford, Malcolm, Poor States or Poor Governance? Jonathan Bonnitcha, Lauge. That is, higher economic development at the respondent state level is associated with lower claimant-investor success rates in ITA.